|
EXAMEN BI
|
2ª vuelta
|
|
Alva
|
9
|
|
Lomelin
|
9.66
|
|
Olvera
|
6.33
|
|
Paz
|
6.66
|
|
Reznik
|
10
|
|
Rodriguez
|
8.66
|
|
Ruanova Sebastian
|
9.66
|
|
Ruiz
|
9.66
|
|
Sanz
|
9.00
|
|
Vázquez
|
8.66
|
|
Villagordoa
|
8.00
|
|
Barroso
|
9.66
|
|
Carranza
|
9.66
|
|
Enriquez
|
9.66
|
|
García
|
6.33
|
|
Incháustegui
|
6.66
|
|
Mendez
|
10
|
|
Menendez
|
6
|
|
Portela
|
7.66
|
|
Ruanova Majo
|
10
|
|
Scheleske
|
9.33
|
|
Valle
|
9
|
|
Zermeño
|
6
|
|
Bustamante
|
7.66
|
|
Espínola
|
9.33
|
|
Hierro
|
8.33
|
|
Ibarra
|
7.66
|
|
Lombana
|
9.33
|
|
Mac Gregor
|
8.33
|
|
Marroquín
|
9.66
|
|
Mondragón
|
8.33
|
|
Pérez Anza
|
7.00
|
|
Somera
|
10.00
|
|
De la Puente
|
7.00
|
|
Díaz Cuervo
|
8.66
|
|
Vélez
|
7.00
|
Biologyinbab
jueves, 12 de enero de 2017
Calificaciones Examenes BI 2a vuelta
miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016
UNAM 2nd round exam Instructions
For those who are going to submit UNAM 2nd round exam.
The exam structure is the same as in the first round, it means that it´ll consist of multiple-choice questions, open-ended questions on specific topics and questions based on data analysis
The topics that can came into the exam are the next ones (numbers are book pages). and I strongly suggest you to review the command terms you already know, so that you take into acount the depth you must answer each question.
The exam structure is the same as in the first round, it means that it´ll consist of multiple-choice questions, open-ended questions on specific topics and questions based on data analysis
The topics that can came into the exam are the next ones (numbers are book pages). and I strongly suggest you to review the command terms you already know, so that you take into acount the depth you must answer each question.
Prokariotic and Eukariotic
Cells.....6 and 7
Passive transport...........10
Mitosis...............14
Water and
life..............19
Proteins and lipids.........22 y 25
Photosynthesis............34
Chromosomes, Karyograms.......39
Meiosis.........40, 41
Autosomal genetic diseases.......43
Mutations.......46
DNA technology.............46, 47, 49, 50 and 51.
Global warming.......60. 61
Evidence for evolution......63
Clasification of biodiversity.....68
Trophic levels and food chain.....57 and 167
Community
structure ............166
Command terms with definitions
Students should be familiar with the following key terms and phrases used in examination questions.
These command terms indicate the depth of treatment required.
Assessment objective 1
- Define Give the precise meaning of a word, phrase, concept or physical
quantity.
- Draw Represent by means of a labelled, accurate diagram or graph,
using a pencil. A ruler (straight edge) should be used for
straight lines. Diagrams should be drawn to scale. Graphs
should have points correctly plotted (if appropriate) and joined
in a straight line or smooth curve.
- Label Add labels to a diagram.
- List Give a sequence of brief answers with no explanation.
- Measure Obtain a value for a quantity.
- State Give a specific name, value or other brief answer without
explanation or calculation.
Assessment objective 2
- Annotate Add brief notes to a diagram or graph.
- Calculate Obtain a numerical answer showing the relevant stages in the
working (unless instructed not to do so).
- Describe Give a detailed account.
- Distinguish Make clear the differences between two or more concepts or
items.
- Estimate Obtain an approximate value.
- Identify Provide an answer from a number of possibilities.
- Outline Give a brief account or summary.
Assessment objective 3
- Analyze Break down in order to bring out the essential elements or
structure.
- Comment Give a judgment based on a given statement or result of a
calculation.
- Compare Give an account of the similarities between two (or more)
items or situations, referring to both (all) of them
throughout.
- Compare and contrast Give an account of similarities and differences
between two (or more) items or situations, referring to both
(all) of them throughout.
- Construct Display information in a diagrammatic or logical form.
- Deduce Reach a conclusion from the information given.
- Design Produce a plan, simulation or model.
- Determine Obtain the only possible answer.
- Discuss Offer a considered and balanced review that includes a
range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or
conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by
appropriate evidence.
- Evaluate Make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and
limitations.
- Explain Give a detailed account including reasons or causes.
- Predict Give an expected result.
- Sketch Represent by means of a diagram or graph (labelled as
appropriate). The sketch should give a general idea of the
required shape or relationship, and should include relevant
features.
- Suggest Propose a solution, hypothesis or other possible answer.
IB 2nd round exam Instructions
For those who are going to
submit IB 2nd round exam only
What you have to study are the command terms. You must take into account that the type of
questions may be multiple choice or open ones.
Command
terms with definitions
Students should be familiar with the following key terms and phrases
used in examination questions.
These command terms indicate the depth of treatment required.
Assessment objective 1
- Define Give the precise meaning of a word,
phrase, concept or physical
quantity.
- Draw Represent by means of a labelled,
accurate diagram or graph,
using a pencil. A
ruler (straight edge) should be used for
straight lines. Diagrams
should be drawn to scale. Graphs
should have points
correctly plotted (if appropriate) and joined
in a straight line or
smooth curve.
- Label Add labels to a diagram.
- List Give a sequence of brief answers with
no explanation.
- Measure Obtain a value for a quantity.
- State Give a specific name, value or
other brief answer without
explanation or
calculation.
Assessment objective 2
- Annotate Add brief notes to a diagram or graph.
- Calculate Obtain a numerical answer showing the
relevant stages in the
working (unless
instructed not to do so).
- Describe
Give a detailed account.
- Distinguish Make clear the differences between two or
more concepts or
items. Estimate
Obtain an approximate value.
- Identify Provide an answer from a number
of possibilities.
- Outline Give a brief account or summary.
Assessment objective 3
- Analyze Break down in order to bring out
the essential elements or
structure.
- Comment Give a judgment based on a given
statement or result of a
calculation.
- Compare Give an account of the similarities
between two (or more)
items or
situations, referring to both (all) of them
throughout.
- Compare and contrast Give an account of similarities and
differences
between two (or
more) items or situations, referring to both
(all) of them throughout.
- Construct Display information in a
diagrammatic or logical form.
- Deduce Reach a conclusion from the
information given.
- Design Produce a plan, simulation or
model.
- Determine Obtain the only possible answer.
- Discuss Offer a considered and balanced
review that includes a
range of
arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or
conclusions
should be presented clearly and supported by
appropriate
evidence.
- Evaluate Make an appraisal by weighing up
the strengths and
limitations.
- Explain Give a detailed account
including reasons or causes.
- Predict Give an expected result.
- Sketch Represent by means of a
diagram or graph (labelled as
appropriate). The
sketch should give a general idea of the
required shape
or relationship, and should include relevant
features.
- Suggest Propose a solution, hypothesis
or other possible answer.
lunes, 19 de diciembre de 2016
UNAM and IB exams (second rounds list)
Hola chicos,
Hablé con Miss Claudia y me explicó que la forma de considerar quienes se van a segunda vuelta es igual, tanto en todas las materias UNAM, como en las que no son curriculares pero si internas del colegio, como en este caso la de IB y es como sigue:
Hablé con Miss Claudia y me explicó que la forma de considerar quienes se van a segunda vuelta es igual, tanto en todas las materias UNAM, como en las que no son curriculares pero si internas del colegio, como en este caso la de IB y es como sigue:
- Si la calificación final es reprobatoria no se promedia con la del intersemestral y se van a segunda vuelta.
- Si pasan el final pero el promedio con la intersemestral es reprobatorio, se van a segunda vuelta.
- Si la final es aprobatoria y aunque hayan reprobado el intersemestral el promedio es aprobatorio No van a segunda vuelta.
Les pongo las calificaciones de los que pasaron y la lista de quienes están en segunda vuelta en UNAM y en IB, y en los próximos días les pongo toda la información de como va a ser cada examen y el temario para cada uno. Hago la aclaración que para aquellos que están en 2a vuelta tanto en UNAM como en IB solo presentan un examen con el que se califican ambas.
UNAM
|
IB
|
|||||
CURRENT PERIOD
|
FINAL AVERAGE
|
IN SECOND R
|
CURRENT PERIOD
|
FINAL AVERAGE
|
IN SECOND R
|
|
Anaya
|
10.00
|
9.7
|
10
|
9.5
|
||
Carrillo
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
De la Puente
|
7.03
|
8.02
|
2V
|
|||
Diaz Cuervo
|
7.03
|
7.34
|
2V
|
|||
Guillen Sebastián
|
7.86
|
8.26
|
7
|
7.8
|
||
Mondragón Eugenio
|
6.35
|
6.97
|
6
|
6.2
|
||
Muñoz Valentina
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Plascencia
|
9.30
|
9.13
|
9
|
9
|
||
Roberts
|
8.53
|
8.08
|
8
|
7.5
|
||
Velez Melanie
|
6.90
|
7.34
|
2V
|
|||
Alonso
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Ambrosi
|
7.10
|
7.63
|
6
|
6.8
|
||
Becerra
|
7.20
|
7.08
|
2V
|
|||
Bustamante
|
6.10
|
7.15
|
2V
|
|||
Espínola
|
7.04
|
6.98
|
2V
|
|||
Fuhrken
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Garza Rodrigo
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Giner
|
8.17
|
7.84
|
6.5
|
7
|
||
Hierro
|
7.46
|
7.1
|
2V
|
|||
Ibarra
|
7.10
|
6.85
|
2V
|
|||
Lombana
|
6.00
|
6.69
|
2V
|
|||
Mc Gregor
|
6.59
|
6.77
|
2V
|
|||
Marroquín
|
7.45
|
6.67
|
2V
|
|||
Mondragon MaFer
|
7.66
|
7.44
|
2V
|
|||
Monrroy
|
7.50
|
7.19
|
6.5
|
6.05
|
||
Ortega
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Perez Anza
|
6.50
|
6.22
|
2V
|
|||
Poo
|
8.92
|
8.85
|
8
|
8.15
|
||
Riba
|
8.23
|
7.8
|
7
|
6.2
|
||
Rodriguez María
|
9.20
|
8.78
|
7.8
|
7.48
|
||
Sabat
|
10.00
|
9.75
|
10
|
9.75
|
||
Somera
|
8.42
|
7.68
|
2V
|
|||
Zarrabe
|
8.50
|
7.96
|
7.8
|
7.3
|
||
Alcaraz
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Alva Giovana
|
8.48
|
8.43
|
6.5
|
7.3
|
||
Barroso
|
6.40
|
6.07
|
2V
|
|||
Borrego
|
8.04
|
7.34
|
6
|
6
|
||
Carranza
|
7.09
|
7.07
|
2V
|
|||
Carús
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
De la Parra
|
7.24
|
7.68
|
6.5
|
7
|
||
Enriquez
|
7.19
|
6.65
|
2V
|
|||
Garcia Rodrigo
|
6.83
|
6.04
|
2V
|
|||
Inchaustgegui
|
6.00
|
6.01
|
2V
|
|||
Malo
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Martinez Natalia
|
10.00
|
9.49
|
9.8
|
9.08
|
||
Mendez Pablo
|
8.18
|
7.42
|
2V
|
|||
Menendez Andrea
|
7.59
|
6.8
|
2V
|
|||
Moreno Paloma
|
2V
|
6
|
6
|
|||
Portela Ines
|
8.29
|
7.94
|
2V
|
|||
Prado
|
7.59
|
2V
|
2V
|
|||
Renero
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Ruanova Majo
|
8.52
|
8.37
|
2V
|
|||
Sainz Mariana
|
8.77
|
8.18
|
7.3
|
6.83
|
||
Scheleske
|
7.02
|
6.75
|
2V
|
|||
Simón
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Táger Ana
|
6.91
|
6.16
|
2V
|
|||
Valle Rodrigo
|
7.06
|
7.1
|
2V
|
|||
Zermeño
|
7.43
|
7.29
|
2V
|
|||
Alva Sergio
|
7.24
|
7.26
|
2V
|
|||
Berjon
|
6.16
|
2V
|
2V
|
|||
Cárdenas
|
8.02
|
7.64
|
6.5
|
6.75
|
||
Escoto
|
8.40
|
6.7
|
7
|
6.5
|
||
Fernandez
|
8.68
|
8.28
|
8.3
|
7.88
|
||
Guillen Ramón
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Jaques
|
7.55
|
6.78
|
6
|
6
|
||
Kleinburg
|
9.75
|
8.96
|
9.5
|
8.75
|
||
Lomelin
|
8.14
|
7.32
|
2V
|
|||
Maraña
|
9.60
|
8.8
|
8.8
|
8.38
|
||
Olvera
|
7.52
|
6.52
|
2V
|
|||
Paz
|
7.22
|
6.56
|
5
|
2V
|
||
Perez Gil
|
7.02
|
6.87
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
||
Reznik
|
7.42
|
7.88
|
2V
|
|||
Rodriguez Camila
|
7.41
|
6.94
|
2V
|
|||
Roux
|
9.46
|
9.35
|
8.8
|
8.88
|
||
Ruanova Sebastian
|
8.08
|
7.51
|
2V
|
|||
Ruiz Ximena
|
6.27
|
6.32
|
2V
|
|||
Sampson
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Santamaría
|
2V
|
2V
|
||||
Sanz Fabiola
|
7.32
|
7.01
|
2V
|
|||
Vazquez Mariana
|
7.87
|
7.16
|
2V
|
|||
Villagordoa
|
7.77
|
6.87
|
2V
|
|||
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)